Memes, in the Dawkins sense, are the cultural equivalent of genes. Just as biological evolution acts on the genetic pool, cultural evolution acts on the memetic pool. A common fallacy about evolution is that the strongest traits are selected for. In reality, ill-suited traits die out while the rest remain by default.

To what extent can we consciously select against ill-suited memes? Harmful memes pose a paradox: compromising perpetuates them, and opposing them risks embodying their flaws. Yet, inaction guarantees their persistence. Perhaps the only response is thoughtful and integrated action despite its imperfections.

Stephanie Sladnick supports Highland Institute's work of imperfect connections—of people, ideas, and actions. From building operations platforms that support businesses, non-profits, and NGOs to volunteering with kids and with TEDxBoulder Salons, Stephanie strives to contribute meaningfully to her local and global community.

In this time of rapid cultural change, how do we know which memes to act on and which to throw away? Perhaps the first step is to confront the fallacies shaping our decisions - like the belief that a single solution can fix everything or that progress is inevitable. Just as humanity is not the pinnacle of evolution, no single idea or action will solve all challenges. As Darwin observed, "It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." Every connection creates an opportunity to move closer to solutions we cannot yet see.