There's a word. There's a word that describes our current healthcare system, dominated by private insurance, regional groups of private hospitals, and other powerful interests that look more like a numbers racket. We would like to think we have health care that incidentally involves some wealth transfer; what we actually have is wealth transfer that incidentally involves some health care. The above-referenced word is amoral.
Can a system be amoral? One tries to find a better word to describe a system which: has become the number one cause of personal bankruptcy; is now the third leading cause of death; is characterized by conflicts of interest and perverse incentives; disempowers the patient; denies the capacity for innate healing; operates with little regard to risk/benefit and cost/benefit ratios; lacks any real transparency; imposes erratic patient privacy laws; is overly beholden to special interests; and has even driven some doctors and other "healers" to the point of such despair that they have abandoned the profession altogether.
Read More